top of page

THE PIG WHO WANTED TO BE EATEN

Image by Benjamin Wedemeyer

the pig that wants to be eaten

​

"After forty years of vegetarianism, Max Berger was about to sit down to a feast of pork sausages, crispy bacon and pan-fried chicken breast. Max had always missed the taste of meat, but his principles were stronger than his culinary cravings. But now he was able to eat meat with a clear conscience.

The sausage and bacon had come from a pig called Priscilla he had met a week before. The pig had been genetically engineered to be able to speak and, more importantly, to want to be eaten. Ending up on a human's table was Priscilla's lifetime ambition and she woke up on the day of her slaughter with a keen sense of anticipation. She had told all this to Max just before rushing off to a comfortable and humane slaughterhouse. Having heard her story, Max thought it would be disrespectful not to eat her.

The chicken had come from a genetically modified bird which had been 'decerebrated'. In other words it lived the life of a vegetable, with no awareness of self, environment, pain or pleasure. Killing it was therefore no more barbarous then uprooting a carrot.

Yet as the plate was placed before him, Max felt a twinge of nausea. Was this just a reflex reaction, caused by a lifetime of vegetarianism? Or was it the physical sign of a justifiable psychic distress? Collecting himself, he picked up his knife and fork...

Source: The Restaurant at the End of the Universe by Douglas Adams (Pan Books, 1980)"

INSTRUCTIONS:
Write a 250 word reflection answering the following questions: Would Max be justified in eating the Pricilla the Pig (who wants to be eaten)? What about the decerebrated chicken? What if Pricilla or the chicken had been human, that is, what if we could genetically engineer humans that wanted to be eaten, would that be ethical? What if we could decerebrate humans? Finally, what do you think Peter Singer (author of Animal Liberation) would have to say about all this?

bottom of page